The vision of the artist is brought back in after the information is processed, or in photography, after the film is developed. In both cases now, there is a greater control of manipulation. The ability to alter the digital image is to reconstruct the electric DNA, which again, is done by a stream of information.

So has photography changed? Should digital imagery made with a camera still be considered "Photography", or has it evolved into something different? If the concept of ÒLight DrawingsÓ was only discovered a couple thousand years ago, then has digital really replaced the heliograph or has modern science just changed?